The Organelle Escape Theory is published here for the first time internationally. More detail can be found in a new blog for the Organelle Escape Theory. See especially the scenario for the evolution of metabolism. The theory fits very well together with the Eukaryote Expansion Theory. The success of these theories (see this evaluation) means that there is most certainly an end for the endosymbiosis theory.
OET was first published in Norwegian in Universitetsavisa. It is one of four possible sequences for the origins of eukaryotes, organelles and bacteria, as mentioned in my earlier blog post. There are many observations that have been used in support of the endosymbiosis theory. Most of them are based on similarities between organelles and bacteria. But there is no easy way to see direction from similarities, so based on similarities my theory is in fact supported equally with Margulis’ theory. The endosymbiosis theory has been interpreted to mean the occurrence of several events that were very improbable and occurred just once in history. But endosymbiosis is observed even today. That is in line with my theory, as it is fundamental in the theory that bacteria are commuting organelles that became more and more autonomous until they could survive without a host. In a few cases the process is not completed, however. E.g. some types of Rickettsia are still commuting organelles. But, as stated above, the theory is based upon missing evidence for the endosymbiosis theory as the only possibility.
ReplyDeleteIt is really interesting for me to read this article. Thanks for it. I like such topics and everything connected to them.
PTE Coaching in Chandigarh
Thanks for your comment. If you want to read more, I have just added some more text and illustrations here: https://www.quora.com/q/tkkmmbivxrtmpfwd. Evaluations of the theory can be found here: https://oetblog.quora.com, and I have also shown how it relates to origin of life here: https://www.quora.com/q/pitevcxananeeias. I appreciate further comments.
DeleteWow brah it was a good and interesting article and was soo easy to understand. Thank you man
ReplyDeleteThanks. If you found this interesting, then maybe you wold also like this: https://www.quora.com/q/tkkmmbivxrtmpfwd. Evaluations of the theory can be found here: https://oetblog.quora.com, and I have also shown how it relates to origin of life here: https://www.quora.com/q/pitevcxananeeias. I appreciate further comments.
DeleteI was surprised to see the date on this as the theory has its beauty, but the sequenced genomes of various species, including archae, in my view are consistent with mitochondria being a symbiote.
ReplyDeleteMy knowledge is not even close to complete, but as one considers that more of the mitDNA genome is moved to the nucleus over time it seems to support. And, the tracing back if the mito-ribosomal structure which is different than the nuclear but can be traced back to archaea.
I've the spent the last few months diving into the research since I left the field and have many observations of theory and research inconsistencies in the "war on cancer".
Love to talk about your theory to see what I may have missed.
Thanks for your comment, Daniel. Yes, I have been working with this theory for a long time. Due to other tasks I have not had the time, but now I have just added some more text and illustrations here: https://www.quora.com/q/tkkmmbivxrtmpfwd. Evaluations of the theory can be found here: https://oetblog.quora.com, and I have also shown how it relates to origin of life here: https://www.quora.com/q/pitevcxananeeias. I appreciate further comments.
ReplyDelete